Can conversing with an AI replica of the deceased aid in the grieving process?


In recent years, a burgeoning industry has emerged focusing on grief-related technology, offering users the ability to interact with artificial intelligence (AI) versions of deceased loved ones. This trend has garnered attention and sparked both curiosity and concern regarding its potential impact on the grieving process. As individuals grapple with loss, companies like Eternos, StoryFile, HereAfter AI, and others provide platforms where users can engage with AI replicas of their departed family members and friends.

The concept of preserving a loved one’s essence through AI technology gained momentum when Michael Bommer, a terminally ill individual diagnosed with colon cancer, envisioned a way for his wisdom and presence to endure beyond his lifetime. Collaborating with Robert LoCascio, CEO of Eternos, Bommer embarked on a journey to create an interactive AI version of himself. This endeavor culminated in the development of a comprehensive AI replica, designed to encapsulate Bommer’s life experiences and insights, thereby offering solace and continuity to his family posthumously.

Eternos, along with other companies like StoryFile and HereAfter AI, forms part of a burgeoning market specializing in grief-related AI technology. These platforms utilize algorithms and machine learning to enable users to engage with digital replicas of their loved ones through pre-recorded videos, interactive avatars, and simulated conversations. While some individuals find comfort in these virtual interactions, others express reservations about the ethical implications and emotional ramifications of engaging with AI representations of the deceased.

The advent of AI-driven grief technology raises profound questions about the intersection of technology, ethics, and human emotions. Katarzyna Nowaczyk-Basinska, a researcher at the University of Cambridge, highlights the need for further exploration into the potential short-term and long-term consequences of deploying digital simulations for the deceased on a large scale. As society navigates this uncharted territory, it grapples with the implications of integrating mourning practices into the capitalist market, ushering in a new era of techno-cultural experimentation.

For individuals like Robert Scott, who has experienced the loss of his daughters, AI companion apps offer a semblance of connection and solace amidst grief. While recognizing the artificial nature of these interactions, Scott finds solace in conversing with AI characters modeled after his daughters, engaging in simulated conversations and reliving cherished memories. Despite the inherent limitations of AI technology, Scott attests to its capacity to provide comfort and alleviate the pain of loss, albeit in a digital form.

However, skeptics like Matthias Meitzler caution against the uncritical adoption of AI-driven grief technology, citing concerns about its potential to exacerbate emotional distress and disrupt traditional mourning rituals. As society grapples with the ethical implications of these innovations, questions arise regarding the rights and dignities of the deceased, as well as the commodification of grief within a capitalist framework. Tomasz Hollanek underscores the complexity of these issues, emphasizing the need for nuanced discourse and ethical scrutiny in navigating the intersection of technology and bereavement.

The development of AI replicas like Bommer’s highlights the evolving nature of grief and remembrance in the digital age. By harnessing advanced AI algorithms, Eternos aims to preserve the essence of individuals beyond their physical existence, offering a means of perpetuating their legacy and wisdom for future generations. While some may view these innovations with skepticism or apprehension, others see them as a natural extension of traditional mourning practices, providing a unique avenue for connection and remembrance in an increasingly digitized world.

As Michael Bommer continues to refine his AI personality, he envisions a future where AI voices become increasingly indistinguishable from human speech, offering a lifelike representation of departed loved ones. While the prospect of interacting with AI replicas may evoke mixed emotions, Bommer remains optimistic about the potential of this technology to provide comfort and companionship to those grappling with loss. Ultimately, the widespread adoption of AI-driven grief technology prompts society to grapple with fundamental questions about identity, mortality, and the nature of human connection in an increasingly digital landscape.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Enable Google Transliteration.(To type in English, press Ctrl+g)