Unrest in Bolivia sparks debate: Was it a coup attempt?


Bolivia has endured a turbulent political history marked by periods of military rule and democratic transition. Since the early 1980s, the nation has strived to consolidate its democracy, but recent events surrounding General Juan José Zúñiga’s actions have revived memories of darker times.

General Zúñiga’s storming of the presidential palace in La Paz has sparked widespread concern about the fragility of Bolivia’s democratic institutions. The incident, described by some as an attempted coup, unfolded against a backdrop of political tension between President Luis Arce and his predecessor Evo Morales. This tension has plunged Bolivia into a political deadlock, hampering governance and exacerbating economic challenges.

To understand the current crisis, one must delve into Bolivia’s recent political trajectory, notably starting with the pivotal 2005 election of Evo Morales. Morales, a former coca-growers’ union leader, came to power promising to empower Bolivia’s indigenous majority and tackle historical inequalities perpetuated by an elite class. His presidency initially showed promise with initiatives like nationalizing the country’s gas fields, a move aimed at benefiting Bolivia’s economy and its people.

However, Morales’s tenure faced significant challenges. Economic fortunes tied to natural gas exports fluctuated with global prices, leading to economic instability. Moreover, Morales’s controversial bid for a third term in 2019, which defied constitutional term limits, triggered widespread protests and accusations of authoritarianism. Amid escalating unrest and pressure from the military, Morales resigned and left Bolivia, later describing his departure as a coup orchestrated by political opponents.

In the aftermath, an interim administration took charge, paving the way for fresh elections in which Morales’s party, the Movement for Socialism (MAS), returned to power under President Luis Arce. Despite this electoral victory, Bolivia remains deeply polarized between supporters of Morales and those aligned with President Arce, who now faces challenges in governing amid economic downturns and social unrest.

The recent events surrounding General Zúñiga’s actions have highlighted the precarious balance of power in Bolivia. His dramatic intervention in La Paz, purportedly at the request of President Arce to counter political adversaries, underscores the volatility of Bolivia’s political landscape. Analysts and observers have raised questions about the authenticity of the coup attempt, suggesting it may have been orchestrated to bolster President Arce’s political standing amidst internal strife.

Carlos Toranzo, a prominent Bolivian political analyst, has pointed out that the incident appeared to be an isolated act rather than a coordinated military movement. This perspective challenges the narrative of a widespread coup attempt and raises concerns about manipulation of political crises for strategic gain. The subsequent arrests and accusations linked to the alleged coup plot have further muddied the waters, with dissenting voices like Aníbal Aguilar Gómez declaring innocence and resorting to extreme measures like hunger strikes to protest their treatment.

Against this backdrop, the term “autogolpe,” or self-coup, has resurfaced in Bolivia’s political lexicon. It refers to a sitting president’s attempt to seize extraordinary powers under the guise of crisis, a move often seen as undermining democratic norms. While the extent of President Arce’s involvement in the recent events remains contentious, the specter of authoritarianism looms large over Bolivia’s fragile democracy.

Monica de Bolle, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, emphasizes that Bolivia’s economic woes have compounded its political challenges. Declining natural gas revenues and foreign exchange reserves coupled with soaring inflation have strained the government’s ability to implement effective policies for economic recovery. The ongoing power struggle between Morales and Arce further complicates matters, diverting attention and resources away from urgent socio-economic reforms needed to alleviate hardship among Bolivians.

Looking ahead to the 2025 presidential elections, Evo Morales’s return to Bolivia and his determination to contest again underscore the entrenched political divisions. His rivalry with President Arce symbolizes deeper ideological clashes within MAS and broader societal cleavages. Monica de Bolle warns that unless Bolivia addresses these internal divisions and economic vulnerabilities, the country risks further instability and democratic erosion.

Bolivia stands at a critical juncture where political maneuvering, economic challenges, and historical grievances converge. The recent events surrounding General Zúñiga’s actions serve as a stark reminder of the country’s tumultuous past and the fragility of its democratic institutions. Whether these events mark a genuine threat to democracy or a political maneuver remains debated, but their implications for Bolivia’s future are profound and uncertain.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Enable Google Transliteration.(To type in English, press Ctrl+g)