Why Tech Companies Are Not Your Friends?


This month, numerous Roku device owners, encompassing streaming sticks, set-top boxes, and internet-connected TVs, were greeted with an unexpected sight upon powering up their devices: a block of text. Counted among them was myself, an owner of an inexpensive Roku TV in my bedroom, encountering the same screen.

The displayed message introduced updated terms of service that made it more challenging for users to take legal action against the company. Unless users agreed to these terms, they were essentially locked out of accessing the Roku menu and apps, rendering their devices virtually unusable. The sole opt-out option presented was to physically mail a letter to the company.

For Isaac Phillips, a software engineer in Tampa, Fla., this imposition felt unjust. In response, he devised a workaround to disconnect his Roku TV from the internet, allowing him to use it as a standard TV without Roku’s apps, including popular streaming services like Netflix and Hulu.

“It should belong to whoever paid for it,” remarked Mr. Phillips. “To completely lock somebody out of it just doesn’t sit right. It’s rather unacceptable.”

Additionally, Roku faced another setback this month with the announcement of a security breach affecting approximately 15,000 user accounts. The breach involved the illicit acquisition of login credentials through a breach of another company’s servers, which were then used to access Roku accounts to purchase streaming subscriptions.

In response to these developments, discussions proliferated in online forums about the implications of companies having the ability to essentially deactivate devices that consumers have paid for. This scenario parallels how companies like Apple, Google, and Microsoft can cease issuing software updates for older devices, leading to their gradual obsolescence.

This recurring lesson underscores the fact that companies, even those professing to prioritize customer satisfaction, ultimately prioritize their own interests. The tech products we purchase can evolve to safeguard these interests, often at the expense of consumer control.

Key Points to Remember:

  1. Ownership Illusion: Modern tech products, unlike their predecessors, are not solely physical entities but include integral software components controlled by the manufacturer. Changes to software interfaces and data collection practices can occur without warning, potentially rendering devices inoperable.
  2. Lack of Consumer Protection: Roku’s recent terms of service updates exemplify the prevalence of mandatory arbitration clauses in the industry, hindering consumers’ ability to collectively address grievances through lawsuits. The convoluted opt-out process underscores the legal leeway companies possess.
  3. Privacy Concerns: Roku’s aggressive data collection practices, revealed through its privacy policy, highlight the trade-off consumers make when using subsidized products. While marketed as consumer-friendly, Roku, like many tech companies, prioritizes profit over user privacy.

The recent controversies surrounding Roku serve as a poignant reminder that tech companies are profit-driven entities, not allies. Consumers must remain vigilant and informed to navigate the complex landscape of modern technology responsibly.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Enable Google Transliteration.(To type in English, press Ctrl+g)